If a deviation from a critical limit occurred and the problem was not addressed, what kind of noncompliance is this?

When a deviation from a critical limit occurs and the issue is not addressed, it signifies a failure to implement proper corrective actions. Corrective actions are essential components of a food safety system, particularly within Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) plans, which are designed to ensure food safety.

Corrective actions must be taken to address any deviations to prevent unsafe food products from being produced. If those actions aren't taken, it leads to noncompliance with food safety regulations and standards, as it suggests a lack of adherence to established protocols intended to keep food safe for consumption.

In this context, not addressing the deviation indicates a breakdown in the process of ensuring that critical limits are maintained. It highlights a situation where potential hazards may not be mitigated, resulting in a risk to food safety. This aligns with the definition of noncompliance regarding the failure to take necessary steps to correct issues that affect safety and quality standards.

The other options pertain to different aspects of the food safety management system. Monitoring involves regularly checking and documenting critical limits, verification ensures that monitoring methods are effective, and recordkeeping relates to the accurate maintenance of documentation that supports compliance. While each is important for overall compliance, the specific situation described emphasizes the need for corrective actions