If an establishment employee fails to perform thermometer calibration as required, what type of noncompliance is this?

The identification of this scenario as a verification noncompliance reflects the importance of ensuring that equipment used in food safety, such as thermometers, is functioning correctly and providing accurate readings. Verification is typically a process that assesses whether the procedures in place are adequately achieving the desired results, which in this case means confirming that the thermometer is accurately measuring temperature.

If an employee neglects to perform the required calibration, it indicates a failure to verify that the thermometer is providing reliable data. This omission can lead to inaccuracies in temperature assessments, impacting food safety and potentially leading to hazardous situations. The verification process includes routine checks and calibrations to ensure that measuring devices maintain their accuracy over time.

In contrast, monitoring would refer to routinely checking or observing processes without the specific focus on accuracy that verification entails. Recordkeeping involves documenting results or observations, which also does not directly relate to the act of failing to carry out calibration itself. Corrective actions would imply addressing a problem after it occurs rather than the preventive measure of calibrating the thermometer initially. Thus, the failure to perform the thermometer calibration is classified under verification noncompliance, as it undermines the integrity of the food safety monitoring process.